This is the mail archive of the
libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: __stat: should it end up as UND in libc.so or not?
- To: Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com>
- Subject: Re: __stat: should it end up as UND in libc.so or not?
- From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>
- Date: 11 Dec 1998 10:53:23 -0800
- Cc: hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu), libc-alpha@cygnus.com
- References: <hjl@lucon.org's message of "Fri, 11 Dec 1998 06:15:02 -0800 (PST)"> <m0zoTLS-0000UXC@sea.lucon.org> <4.1.19981211184912.0401c610@mail.lauterbach.com>
- Reply-To: drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper)
Franz Sirl <Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com> writes:
> Hmm, one candidate was dirent/opendir.os (sysdeps/unix/opendir.c) AFAI
> remember. This one includes <sys/stat.h> and uses __stat. It should use
> __xstat here?
Not necessarily. If there is a macro __xstat...
> These are actually quite easy to find, compile glibc with -O0
> and then use find -name "*.os"|xargs objdump|less
I'll see whether I can recompile everything without optimization.
--
---------------. drepper at gnu.org ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com `------------------------