This is the mail archive of the
libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: <netinet/in.h> versus <linux/in.h>,<linux/in6.h>: Needs syncing
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de>
- Subject: Re: <netinet/in.h> versus <linux/in.h>,<linux/in6.h>: Needs syncing
- From: Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1998 09:48:26 +0100
- cc: libc-hacker@cygnus.com
>Could somebody with more knowledge of networking than I have bring
><linux/in.h> and <linux/in6.h> in sync with glibc's
>sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bits/in.h, please?
I'll look into it this morning. But I think that not all the definitions
in the linux/* header files belong in bits/in.h in fact. Some of them should
probably go elsewhere.
p.