This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[COMMITTED] Fix a few whitespace arrangement inconsistencies in time/strftime_l.c
- From: TAMUKI Shoichi <tamuki at linet dot gr dot jp>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:31:47 +0900
- Subject: [COMMITTED] Fix a few whitespace arrangement inconsistencies in time/strftime_l.c
Having checked the arrangement of whitespace in time/strftime_l.c
using "unexpand" and "unexpand -a" command, three inconsistencies are
detected. So fix them for consistency.
ChangeLog:
* time/strftime_l.c: Fix a few whitespace arrangement inconsistencies.
---
time/strftime_l.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/time/strftime_l.c b/time/strftime_l.c
index cb3b8d3..98c35d5 100644
--- a/time/strftime_l.c
+++ b/time/strftime_l.c
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ __strftime_internal (CHAR_T *s, size_t maxsize, const CHAR_T *format,
int pad = 0; /* Padding for number ('-', '_', or 0). */
int modifier; /* Field modifier ('E', 'O', or 0). */
int digits; /* Max digits for numeric format. */
- int number_value; /* Numeric value to be printed. */
+ int number_value; /* Numeric value to be printed. */
int negative_number; /* 1 if the number is negative. */
const CHAR_T *subfmt;
CHAR_T *bufp;
@@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ __strftime_internal (CHAR_T *s, size_t maxsize, const CHAR_T *format,
do
*--bufp = u % 10 + L_('0');
while ((u /= 10) != 0);
- }
+ }
do_number_sign_and_padding:
if (negative_number)
@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ __strftime_internal (CHAR_T *s, size_t maxsize, const CHAR_T *format,
DO_NUMBER (2, tp->tm_sec);
case L_('s'): /* GNU extension. */
- {
+ {
struct tm ltm;
time_t t;
--
2.2.1