This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.29 - Winter is coming...


On 02/01/19 5:22 PM, Rafal Luzynski wrote:
I have partially reviewed two patches but I don't know whether they are
correct or not and I've asked for more help or for freeze exceptions before:

[1] Cyrillic -> ASCII transliteration: I am not sure which locale should
implement the feature (C? Russian + few more? All locales with few
exceptions?),
also I am not sure how to deal with digraphs (if an original letter is
uppercase then should the output digraph be all uppercase, like "SH",
or should only the first letter be uppercase, like "Sh"?)  This may
happen to be the change in locale data only.

I've finally mustered up a bit of courage to read up and give my opinions on this, given that nobody else has. My focus has been on breaking the deadlock because ISTM that the review is stuck on seemingly mundane issues that can either be trivially fixed up later or may not be as serious, such as the choice of implementing in C vs one of the Latin locales or the use of all-caps vs init-caps.

However, I am acutely aware that I may not understand the gravity of some of the differences and you're free to throw my opinions out the window :)

[2] [3] Default width for "%Ey" which is important due to the Japanese
era change in 4 months.  Also, this patch fixes handling of formatting
flags so if that helps it can be split into the patches fixing the width
issue and fixing the flags issue.

A more detailed explanation of what the Japanese era change entails is needed in here, i.e. why is the padding needed and what would the output look like if we don't fix it in this release and why that would be a problem.

Other than that, this seems like something we can make an exception for, assuming that it does not affect translations. I personally would have done 2 different patches, but I know others in the community who would have stuck this into a single patch so I don't have too strong an opinion about that aspect of this patch.

Siddhesh


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]