This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v3] Y2038: make __difftime compatible with 64-bit time
- From: Albert ARIBAUD <albert dot aribaud at 3adev dot fr>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 22:17:20 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Y2038: make __difftime compatible with 64-bit time
- References: <20181013211641.5215-1-albert.aribaud@3adev.fr> <20181013231828.33e74b22@athena> <20181205120529.2f473669@athena> <20181219213041.34a7fb6d@athena> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1812192038450.2810@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Hi Joseph,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 20:40:14 +0000, Joseph Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote :
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2018, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 12:05:29 +0100, Albert ARIBAUD
> > <albert.aribaud@3adev.fr> wrote :
> >
> > > On Sat, 13 Oct 2018 23:18:28 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
> > > <albert.aribaud@3adev.fr> wrote :
> > >
> [...]
> [...]
> [...]
> > >
> > > Any comments on this patch?
> >
> > Ping -- just rebased and re-ran make checks on this patch, still good.
>
> <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2018-10/msg00225.html> is missing
> libc_hidden_proto / libc_hidden_def for __difftime64, and is missing ". "
> at the end of a comment. (If that's not the version for which you want
> review, you should give the URL to a patch when pinging it....)
sorry for the unclear ref, and thhanks for the heads-up. v4 on its way.
Cordialement,
Albert ARIBAUD
3ADEV