This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.29: Reminder, only ~3 weeks to freeze!

From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Romain Naour <romain dot naour at gmail dot com>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 21:14:10 +0000
Subject: Re: glibc 2.29: Reminder, only ~3 weeks to freeze!
References: <b757e047-3e87-060e-8692-d5a960942cc1@redhat.com> <f632cacb-59ff-bf79-6530-fb25cbf955a2@gmail.com> <ef427958-3899-1123-5782-a15f0ee8abe4@gmail.com>

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Romain Naour wrote:

> Actually there is a regression when the toolchain is built with glibc 2.29 and
> gcc 4.9 (when USE_ATOMIC_COMPILER_BUILTINS is not defined):

What platform is this on?

We could consider removing support for building with GCC 4.9; it's more 
than a year since we moved to that as minimum version for building glibc, 
so maybe moving to GCC 5 as a minimum would now make sense.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.29: Reminder, only ~3 weeks to freeze!
  - From: Romain Naour

References:
- glibc 2.29: Reminder, only ~3 weeks to freeze!
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: glibc 2.29: Reminder, only ~3 weeks to freeze!
  - From: Romain Naour
- Re: glibc 2.29: Reminder, only ~3 weeks to freeze!
  - From: Romain Naour

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]