This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] RISC-V: Regenerate ULPs of RISC-V

From: Zong Li <zongbox at gmail dot com>
To: dj at redhat dot com
Cc: joseph at codesourcery dot com, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt dot com>, darius at bluespec dot com, Andrew Waterman <andrew at sifive dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Zong Li <zong at andestech dot com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 10:44:48 +0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] RISC-V: Regenerate ULPs of RISC-V
References: <4048196580b0ecbde3abea83c3a61fe9fb6429ec.1543572707.git.zongbox@gmail.com> <xn8t10q41p.fsf@greed.delorie.com>

DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> 於 2018年12月8日 週六 上午8:02寫道：
>
>
> Zong Li <zongbox@gmail.com> writes:
> > -ildouble: 1
> > -ldouble: 1
> > +ildouble: 8
> > +ldouble: 8
>
> In addition to what Joseph said, if rv32 and rv64 are giving different
> ULPs for the "same" FPU, something is likely wrong.  Before sharing ULP
> files between rv32 and rv64, please re-generate on both targets
> independently and prove that they're the same.
>
> I certainly would question anything that increases the ULPs for rv64.

Ok, I would check this issue and re-generate on rv64 together.

References:
- [PATCH v4 06/10] RISC-V: Regenerate ULPs of RISC-V
  - From: Zong Li
- Re: [PATCH v4 06/10] RISC-V: Regenerate ULPs of RISC-V
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]