This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2] Remove unnecessary locking when reading iconv configuration [BZ #22062]



On 17/10/2018 10:25, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On 10/17/18 8:19 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16/10/2018 11:23, Arjun Shankar wrote:
>>> -	}
>>> +      /* No user-defined path.  Make a modifiable copy of the
>>> +         default path.  */
>>> +      gconv_path = strdupa (default_gconv_path);
>>> +      gconv_path_len = sizeof (default_gconv_path);
>>> +      cwd = NULL;
>>> +      cwdlen = 0;
>>> +    }
>>> +  else
>>> +    {
>>> +      /* Append the default path to the user-defined path.  */
>>> +      size_t user_len = strlen (__gconv_path_envvar);
>>> +
>>> +      gconv_path_len = user_len + 1 + sizeof (default_gconv_path);
>>> +      gconv_path = alloca (gconv_path_len);
>>> +      __mempcpy (__mempcpy (__mempcpy (gconv_path, __gconv_path_envvar,
>>> +                                       user_len),
>>> +                            ":", 1),
>>> +                 default_gconv_path, sizeof (default_gconv_path));
>>> +      cwd = __getcwd (NULL, 0);
>>> +      cwdlen = __glibc_unlikely (cwd == NULL) ? 0 : strlen (cwd);
>>
>> It this alloca really necessary? Can't we get rid of on along with fix (same
>> for other cases including strdupa)?
> 
> No. Not in the same fix please. This is what Florian is talking about, there 
> are buffer management issues here, but we need to handle them distinctly from
> the P&C issue, which should be the *only* thing changing in this patch.
> 

Ack, I agree it should be a different patch.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]