This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.28 machine testing.

From: Samuel Thibault <samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 18:15:20 +0200
Subject: Re: glibc 2.28 machine testing.
References: <b8dcf66e-f489-dbab-b5ca-f9cfa28206fc@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807271608130.15481@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Joseph Myers, le ven. 27 juil. 2018 16:09:32 +0000, a ecrit:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > We are doing machine testing for glibc 2.28 to get results from all the
> > machine maintainers and put it on the wiki for the release:
> > https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.28
> > 
> > Please test glibc master for your machine :-)
> > 
> > You may also want to cleanup your ULPS results.
> 
> You didn't ask anyone to test m68k, sh or Hurd.  Are you planning to test 
> those yourself? :-)

I'm doing the Hurd part for the general tests. I'm not sure I'll have
the time to run ULPS. In principle the results are basically the same as
linux i386, the difference is mostly due to my usually running in a VM.

Samuel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.28 machine testing.
  - From: Joseph Myers

References:
- glibc 2.28 machine testing.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: glibc 2.28 machine testing.
  - From: Joseph Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]