This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.28 status.

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:34:17 +0200
Subject: Re: glibc 2.28 status.
References: <5fee6dec-3e32-7e34-f2e8-c8e9a64134b2@redhat.com> <fb53a597-5050-3f73-03c4-bb317a139078@linaro.org> <00d220fc-281e-49aa-d0fb-f19bfd693017@redhat.com>

On 07/23/2018 11:52 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

This is where 'Signed-off-from' is really useful. Right now I don't
know if Florian and Joseph think this implementation is ready.

Do you mean Reviewed-By:? The commits I reviewed weren't posted to thelist, so this kernel development approach does not apply in this case.

Could you confirm you think the C threads implementation is ready?


I didn't see any remaining issues in the code.  The ABI looked okay to me.

Thanks,
Florian

References:
- glibc 2.28 status.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: glibc 2.28 status.
  - From: Adhemerval Zanella
- Re: glibc 2.28 status.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]