This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC][PATCH v1 0/5] Proof-of-Concept implementation of RTLD_SHARED for dlmopen


Now we have a few good win/win scenarios:

* You can now force objects into a dlmopen namespace even if you link
 directly with them by setting DT_LMNS to a value other than $.*
 You would have to look these objects up to use them via a namespaced
 dl_iterate_phtr?

* You can add new objects to $PROXY if you want them to be exposed
 through all of the namespaces too.

Thoughts?

 - namespaced dl_iterate_phdr would make my life easier, so thumbs up.

 - need to refresh my memory regarding dl_map_object - I think we'd need
   to harvest this info in _dl_map_object_from_fd and set a flag in
   the struct for easy checking later (or maybe keep a list of
   must-proxy objects, sort of analogous to how RTLD_GLOBAL objects
   are tracked, I guess).

Which reminds me - the code currently has a comment in it that says
RTLD_GLOBAL is nonsensical for namespaces but this isn't exactly true:
I think it makes sense for RTLD_GLOBAL to mean "use this for everything
in the target namesapace" (Mesa libGL for example RTLD_GLOBAL dlopens
_itself_ to export symbols to modules it is about to open, which I have
to trap when isolating libGL).

In effect, the $PROXY DT_LMNS DSOs become super-global (Solar?)
and RTLD_GLOBAL is extended to mean "for this namespace".


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]