This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures

From: Javier Serrano Polo <javier at jasp dot net>
To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:04:24 +0100
Subject: Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <1517756479.29018.96.camel@sempati.menos4> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802051644140.4209@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Reply-to: javier--CbphpPOVok9WFxGWvC7CbkqlsxDZyT at jasp dot net

It looks like multiarch interpreter names should come from multiarch
distros. I only know about Debian-based ones. The list of tuples that
would form the names is at:
https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples

Using multiarch tuples from Debian is the best answer so far. No one is
advocating names with infixes.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
  - From: Javier Serrano Polo

References:
- Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
  - From: Javier Serrano Polo
- Re: Multiarch interpreter names for traditional architectures
  - From: Joseph Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]