This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] New numbers in the benchtests.
On Saturday 16 December 2017 10:55 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> Sure, but that's more a Red Hat specific use case than an upstream use
> case. From the upstream perspective we only care about the input and it
> doesn't get treated any more specially than other inputs (my response to
> Ben explains why). Maybe one way to deal with this is to upstream this
> with just a comment at the end of the upstream namespace it belongs and
> then replace the comment with the ##name tag in a downstream patch for
> Red Hat/Fedora.
To be clear, I am all for adding the inputs, I am not convinced about
the separate vendor-specific partition for it. Vendor-specific
partitions only make sense if they are for a specific workload, such as
for spec2006.wrf that Wilco added a while back for one of the math