This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 11/19/2017 12:49 AM, Rical Jasan wrote:
+@var{protection} is a combination of the @code{PROT_*} flags described +above. +The return values of the function are also missing: "@code{mprotect} returns @code{0} on success or @code{-1} on error."Do we use @code{-1} or @math{-1}? Existing practice is incosistent.@math is for mathematical expressions, and the Texinfo manual says: "In essence, @math switches into plain TeX math mode." [1] While the Texinfo manual never explicitly states return values should be formatted with @code, consider the example they use for how @code looks when it's rendered: "The function returns @code{nil}." [2]
$nil$ is a product of the variables $n$, $i$, $l$, so it's clearly different. In LaTeX, inside a mathematical expression, you would use something like $\mathrm{nil}$, or more likely, a special symbol.
Thanks, Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |