This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[PATCH v10 0/5][BZ 10871] Month names in alternative grammatical case
- From: Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 12:43:10 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: [PATCH v10 0/5][BZ 10871] Month names in alternative grammatical case
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Reply-to: Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com>
This is the 10th version of my patches, this time with a hope that
it may be the final version, hence no more "RFC" tag in the subject.
But, of course, the review is still needed.
Changes since the previous version (v9):
* The first patch of the series has been considered complete and
loosely related with the rest therefore has been accepted and
pushed to stable. [1]
* Commit messages corrected.
* ChangeLog changes removed (temporarily, actually moved to other
patches which are not published here).
* Fixed bug in strptime(), thanks Zack Weinberg for finding and
fixing it.
* Order of matching the month names in strptime() is consequent:
basic month name, abbreviated, alternative, abbreviated alternative.
* Some tests for strptime() added.
* Everything rebased to the current (oh, sorry, yesterday's) master.
This series publishes the patches 1, 3, and 5. These patches are skipped:
0002 Regenerate locfile-kw.h + ChangeLog to the previous commit (bug 10871).
0004 Again regenerate locfile-kw.h + ChangeLog to the previous commit (bug
10871).
They contain the changes to the automatically generated files and
should be eventually merged into the patches 1 and 3, respectively,
before pushing to the git repo but should not be reviewed here.
For those who want to examine, they are available in bugzilla [2]
and my github repo. [3] Also note that in order to actually see
any difference you also need the locale data which are not here
but also in bugzilla and github. Unfortunately, my COPR repo [4]
is not updated this time, this means that the packages in the main
Fedora repositories are more recent and will overwrite my packages.
Again, note that the backward compatibility patches which may be
still around most probably will be rejected.
Regards,
Rafal
[1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=f301e53
[2] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10871
[3] https://github.com/rluzynski/glibc
[4] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rluzynski/genitive/