This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Test for profiling support (_mcount/gprof)
On 08/16/2017 05:30 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Aug 16 2017, Florian Weimer <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On 08/16/2017 05:20 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> On Aug 16 2017, Florian Weimer <email@example.com> wrote:
>>>> If you don't use --enable-frame-pointer for GCC, there's no apparent
>>>> reason to me to build glibc with --fomit-frame-pointer because it's the
>>>> default (albeit in a fashion that is compatible with -pg).
>>> That is not true.
>> It is currently true—I don't see why anyone would want to build glibc
>> this way. Could you enlighten me?
> To omit the frame pointer.
But GCC does it by default if you don't build with
--enable-frame-pointer, at least on i386, which is the architecture for
which you reported the failure.