This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Add math benchmark latency test
On Wednesday 16 August 2017 08:03 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> Ah sorry, I should have been clearer - inverse in terms of units, not
>> value, i.e. throughput is typically expressed in items/unit time while
>> latency is expressed in time/unit item.
> maybe "throughput-time" ?
Sure, but throughput proper (i.e. comparisons) will give bigger numbers
and happier marketing teams :)