This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add math benchmark latency test

From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at gotplt dot org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan at linux dot intel dot com>, Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco dot Dijkstra at arm dot com>, "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Cc: nd <nd at arm dot com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 20:06:17 +0530
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add math benchmark latency test
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <0e008f2e-f41a-1bb8-803c-2f798e2c3541@gotplt.org> <d8612b78-7a02-40e8-d8bd-9b221eff4b7b@linux.intel.com> <a3d0f45c-d283-8144-c770-96f434aef7b4@gotplt.org> <b1cfe590-d5af-bba4-0d9a-c639165854a9@linux.intel.com>

On Wednesday 16 August 2017 08:03 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> Ah sorry, I should have been clearer - inverse in terms of units, not
>> value, i.e. throughput is typically expressed in items/unit time while
>> latency is expressed in time/unit item.
> 
> maybe "throughput-time" ?

Sure, but throughput proper (i.e. comparisons) will give bigger numbers
and happier marketing teams :)

Siddhesh

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Add math benchmark latency test
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: Re: [PATCH] Add math benchmark latency test
  - From: Arjan van de Ven
- Re: [PATCH] Add math benchmark latency test
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH] Add math benchmark latency test
  - From: Arjan van de Ven

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]