This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Removing old notes from the source tree
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
- To: Paul Eggert <eggert at cs dot ucla dot edu>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 07:56:43 -0400
- Subject: Re: Removing old notes from the source tree
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAKCAbMjt9jSkH6QO9My88GBPhjozayztPPa0=EgvSnrahoiqgA@mail.gmail.com> <email@example.com>
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Paul Eggert <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> whether we actually need COPYING as well as COPYING.LIB
> It's useful for code that is not intended to be installed as part of the
> library and that lists the GPL as its license, e.g., catgets/gencat.c.
Well, OK, but having the file at top level might confuse people into
thinking that the entire library is dual-licensed. If the GPL weren't
so long I would suggest dumping it into LICENSES with the rest of the
"this applies at your option to only some of the files in this tree"
cases. Anyone have a better idea?