This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 1/1] Pashto yesstr/nostr locale are missing
- From: Mike FABIAN <mfabian at redhat dot com>
- To: Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com>
- Cc: Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh dot k at samsung dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, pankaj dot m at samsung dot com
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:02:07 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Pashto yesstr/nostr locale are missing
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- Authentication-results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
- Authentication-results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mfabian at redhat dot com
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com E80457F6A6
- Dmarc-filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com E80457F6A6
- References: <CGME20170705065026epcas5p4ffcb6d095c765fcaa9d6ffa1dc9b1d3b@epcas5p4.samsung.com> <1499237246-35855-1-git-send-email-akhilesh.k@samsung.com> <s9dtw2q7z1s.fsf@redhat.com> <1206618834.1008099.1499473135406@poczta.nazwa.pl>
Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> wrote:
> 6.07.2017 10:24 Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Akhilesh Kumar <akhilesh.k@samsung.com> wrote:
>>
>> > [...]
>> > diff --git a/localedata/locales/ps_AF b/localedata/locales/ps_AF
>> > index 702a830..2413b1c 100644
>> > --- a/localedata/locales/ps_AF
>> > +++ b/localedata/locales/ps_AF
>> > @@ -232,6 +232,8 @@ END LC_MONETARY
>> > LC_MESSAGES
>> > yesexpr "<U005E><U005B><U002B><U0031><U0079><U0059><U0628><U0066><U005D>"
>> > noexpr
>> > "<U005E><U005B><U002D><U0030><U006E><U004E><U062E><U0646><U006F><U005D>"
>> > +yesstr "<U0647><U0648>"
>> > +nostr "<U0646><U0647>"
>> > END LC_MESSAGES
>> >
>> > LC_MEASUREMENT
>>
>> I checked that http://thepashto.com/ gives the same strings for yes and
>> no.
>>
>> Committed.
>
> Don't yesexpr and noexpr need an update now? At least, I can't see
> "<U0647>" character in yesexpr.
Yes, but I am unsure how. There are some Arabic characters in yesexpr
and noexpr, but they seem to have nothing to do with what we have no in
yesstr and nostr. I wonder whether these Arabic characters which we have
now in yesexpr and noexpr are just wrong ...
--
Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com>