This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: valgrind support for glibc master


On Thursday 22 June 2017 04:44 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> glibc performs a quick test run using valgrind as part of the build process.
> 
> Lately, this started crashing:
> 
> + elf/ld.so --library-path .:elf:nptl:dlfcn /usr/bin/valgrind elf/ld.so
> --library-path .:elf:nptl:dlfcn /usr/bin/true
> ==924== Memcheck, a memory error detector
> ==924== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
> ==924== Using Valgrind-3.13.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
> ==924== Command: elf/ld.so --library-path .:elf:nptl:dlfcn /usr/bin/true
> ==924==
> ARM64 front end: branch_etc
> disInstr(arm64): unhandled instruction 0xD5380000
> disInstr(arm64): 1101'0101 0011'1000 0000'0000 0000'0000
> ==924== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x11f548.
> ==924==    at 0x11F548: init_cpu_features (cpu-features.c:32)
> ==924==    by 0x11F548: dl_platform_init (dl-machine.h:241)
> ==924==    by 0x11F548: _dl_sysdep_start (dl-sysdep.c:231)
> ==924==    by 0x10981B: _dl_start_final (rtld.c:412)
> ==924==    by 0x109AAB: _dl_start (rtld.c:520)
> ==924==    by 0x108F47: ??? (in
> /builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.25-545-g9649350/build-aarch64-redhat-linux/elf/ld.so)
> 
> The line in question is:
> 
>       asm volatile ("mrs %0, midr_el1" : "=r"(id));
> 
> That seems to match the instruction bit pattern, too.  There is a check
> around it:

This needs a valgrind patch to identify reading midr_el1 (in
VEX/priv/guest_arm64_toIR.c AFAICT), which is trapped and emulated by
the kernel since 4.11.

Is someone already working on this or would you like me to do this?

Siddhesh


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]