This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] aarch64: fix errno address calculation in SYSCALL_ERROR_HANDLER()



On 07/02/2017 15:06, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:42:25PM -0200, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 07/02/2017 12:54, Yury Norov wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 10:10:42AM -0200, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>>>> If it is an user visible issue it requires a bugzilla report (although I am not
>>>> sure in this situation since I think this issue should arise only for ilp32).
>>>
>>> This is not a user-visible bug because arm64/ilp32 is not a user
>>> visible feature at now. If you think that I should create a bug, I can do it.
>>
>> Right, aarch64 lp64 does not trigger so I think we may proceed without
>> opening a bug report.
> 
>  [...]
>  
>>> If you think there should be the specific test for this case, I can
>>> write it. But I think it should be the test for pseudo syscalls
>>> wrapper, not the part of mmap() or write() test.
>>
>> My only concern is if and why glibc own testsuite did not trigger this
>> kind of issue in any tests and in this case if it was by chance or lack
>> of coverage. If glibc own testsuite does not trigger this in any case,
>> I think a regression should be added.
> 
> OK, I'll write some test tomorrow. (Too late in my place)
> 
> Is the patch fine by itself? Can you (someone) push it?
> 
> Yury
> 

I will handle it.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]