This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 22 Nov 2016 17:43, Florian Weimer wrote: > Due to an accident, we export __longjmp under a public symbol version > for the powerpc32/fpu configuration. > > __longjmp is declared as hidden for internal use. This means that any > reference to this symbol (of which there aren't any right now in > libc.so) will cause the symbol to turn unexported. The reason is that > the linker does not distinguish between hidden definitions and > references. GCC emits a .hidden directive in the __longjmp-referencing > translation unit, and this kills the .symver-based export. > > I propose the removal of the __longjmp export as the simplest fix. > __longjmp is in the implementation namespace and is not used in a public > header. As a result, nothing out there should reference it. > > If this is not acceptable, I'll come up with different approach to > address this. But I prefer to address this issue in this way. > > Tested on a powerpc32/fpu configuration with no regressions. makes sense to me. not sure how any package would end up with a reference to this symbol in their binaries. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |