This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] X86-64: Add _dl_runtime_resolve_avx[512]_opt [BZ #20508]
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 09:08:34 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] X86-64: Add _dl_runtime_resolve_avx[512]_opt [BZ #20508]
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMe9rOojpuFz1jTbMpNcqZK1KVDqaWozNuEuS3E67dvD3Rh=hw@mail.gmail.com> <c6e21847-bc95-3c75-ed54-798c62194072@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOp=bvrk0MBF8SrP4JqLHembRdeyfGNqNkcVWvoEs3R=tA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOo7MmGNPKct=AzzbtR564yH1P96tUcLD7pFv7GtxF3-Ng@mail.gmail.com> <48eeea78-99e8-f255-bd26-b6d28929b4f0@twiddle.net> <CAMe9rOqXhVLVbT90JBfkJnCLzZBrkUHtkO4Ddfk9HPH7jiyEzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOoDp7XYwLdDetFNghAdDo_zj-4342LKV4i0zCH36aBWtw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOo+_TQABBp0eC4nQcJ5ENLrZAOSvtAjo17E6H0ezDpWvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMe9rOqoATTPzXqjtqenV0h+hMtMYcr+W-ZL3Bi4jFJWYBCUpg@mail.gmail.com> <76f9e5c1-d1de-04d1-49f5-30673bf3060b@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOq8yu+b0-N6UR3vb843NApZ+ZjBwAw5GsERHpvuCrVjrw@mail.gmail.com> <14cc7a47-1a39-6285-d4b5-dab2769c092b@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOrqmLmHLhHL7pDSvR=8=dUUGP07zY5A3DiOubtpvR25WQ@mail.gmail.com> <ea7fe73f-b8cb-6049-d4c4-918d724bd883@redhat.com>
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/04/2016 05:34 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/04/2016 04:47 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/27/2016 07:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any comments? I will check it in next week if there is no objection.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to backport it to 2.23 and 2.24 branches. Any objections?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Just this change, or the requirement for an AVX512F-capable assembler
>>>>> as
>>>>> well?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Good question. This is also needed:
>>>>
>>>> commit f43cb35c9b3c35addc6dc0f1427caf51786ca1d2
>>>> Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Fri Jul 1 05:54:43 2016 -0700
>>>>
>>>> Require binutils 2.24 to build x86-64 glibc [BZ #20139]
>
>
>>> That's not really backportable, I'm afraid. Our users don't expect we
>>> break
>>> builds in this way.
>>>
>>
>> Who are those users?
>
>
> We don't know, really. But moving forward the baseline binutils requirement
> in a stable release really contradicts what a stable release is about.
>
>
Do our users expect a broken glibc binary of a stable release on AVX512
machine?
--
H.J.