This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 08/05/2016 07:40 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
+static _IO_off64_t +_IO_wmem_seekoff (_IO_FILE *fp, _IO_off64_t offset, int dir, int mode) +{ + struct _IO_FILE_wmemstream *mp = (struct _IO_FILE_wmemstream *) fp; + if (fp->_wide_data->_IO_write_ptr != mp->seekwriteptr) + mp->prevwriteptr = fp->_wide_data->_IO_write_ptr; + _IO_off64_t ret = _IO_wstr_seekoff (fp, offset, dir, mode); + mp->seekwriteptr = fp->_wide_data->_IO_write_ptr; + return ret; +}
As far as I can see, glibc will not call seekoff from the vfprintf code, ever, and _IO_wstr_jumps is only used for that. This means the only actual use of _IO_wstr_seekoff is in the wmemstream code. So you could rename/move _IO_wstr_seekoff and change it directly. It should be fine to use a NULL pointer in _IO_wstr_jumops, just like _IO_obstack_jumps does.
In contrast, _IO_str_seekoff is used from libstdc++ in GCC 2.95, so we cannot change it.
Florian
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |