This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Collation of INFINITY vs. EMPTY SET?
- From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Mike Fabian <mfabian at redhat dot com>, Pravin Satpute <psatpute at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 15:35:04 +0000
- Subject: Re: Collation of INFINITY vs. EMPTY SET?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <573AA6FF dot 3020604 at redhat dot com>
On Tue, 17 May 2016, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Is the solution to write automation to create iso14651_t1_common
> and list all the unspecified elements in code point order?
We should have automation, which should follow current Unicode data except
where there are deliberate differences (bug 14095). I expect both making
automation to follow the current data, and identifying existing deliberate
differences, to be substantial amounts of work.
(That's a framework for answering the question of how glibc should behave,
rather than an answer for how to achieve particular results.)
Joseph S. Myers