This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: gnu-gabi group
- From: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>, Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Suprateeka R Hegde <hegdesmailbox at gmail dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 17:32:03 +0100
- Subject: Re: gnu-gabi group
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMe9rOqPzub4Qr95JT9_U9FBtbME4Xb2ZTgqPrN-Umf70vWGbQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <87io1z2e2i dot fsf at mid dot deneb dot enyo dot de> <CAMe9rOqxZ6NDTc9pKJRpA--A_+moVNSZXyvZ0mkebx0X+LD=_g at mail dot gmail dot com> <87egcn2diz dot fsf at mid dot deneb dot enyo dot de> <CAMe9rOr6jj0ax0B=9dFpuMYCu=HJaf9a3g2-NGnvNV2ZWTqwXg at mail dot gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1602082307130 dot 18645 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAMe9rOqoABu=bD5tgeBQsQXWZmhd5CHSZuwfobg8ezoCmCHNGg at mail dot gmail dot com> <56BC61F0 dot 3010507 at gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1602111635320 dot 29940 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20160211182033 dot GA23152 at blokker dot redhat dot com> <56BE2824 dot 7080906 at redhat dot com> <orpovyhtng dot fsf at livre dot home>
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 13:37 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2016, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 02/11/2016 06:20 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> >> If we could ask overseers to setup a new group/list gnu-gabi on sourceware
> >> where binutils, gcc, gdb, glibc and other interested parties could join
> >> to maintain these extensions and ask for clarifications that would be
> >> wonderful. I am not a big fan of google groups mailinglists, they seem
> >> to make it hard to subscribe and don't have easy to access archives.
> >> Having a local gnu-gabi group on sourceware.org would be better IMHO.
>
> > +1
>
> +1
Great. I'll ask overseers to create a mailinglist.
We could use that to discuss how to evolve/document the relevant GNU
extensions and then ask for a repository and web page later.
Thanks,
Mark