This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 3/5] localedata: CLDRv28: update LC_ADDRESS.country_name translations
- From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, Marko Myllynen <myllynen at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 13:46:54 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] localedata: CLDRv28: update LC_ADDRESS.country_name translations
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20160209061848 dot GE7732 at vapier dot lan> <20160209072042 dot GG7732 at vapier dot lan> <56B99471 dot 4000709 at redhat dot com> <20160209080011 dot GJ7732 at vapier dot lan> <56BA53A8 dot 2070704 at redhat dot com> <20160209214819 dot GR7732 at vapier dot lan> <56BB8DD6 dot 9020808 at redhat dot com> <20160210201256 dot GA7732 at vapier dot lan> <56BC0DC4 dot 3070404 at redhat dot com> <56BC534B dot 5040306 at redhat dot com> <20160211123948 dot GC7732 at vapier dot lan>
On 02/11/2016 01:39 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 11 Feb 2016 10:24, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> On 02/11/2016 05:27 AM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> On 02/10/2016 03:12 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>>> then it would be obvious what version of CLDR was used to
>>>> update the locale. the downside is that the file isn't 100%
>>>> sourced from CLDR, so it seems like clobbering all the fields
>>>> is wrong ?
>>> Per FSF statement  the locale files are not copyrightable so
>>> IMO attribution matters only so much as we care to thank the
>>> previous authors for their work. Such previous authors already
>>> have attribution in the Changelog, and IMO need not have any
>>> more attribution in the source file, just like we don't use
>>> "Contributed by" anymore.
>> unicode.org claims copyright on CLDR data:
> perhaps on all the files and their collection and additional data,
> but you can't copyright facts.
There are some jurisdictions where the legislator intends that
creators of collections of facts have some exclusive rights regarding
the use of these collections. Details are extremely hairy, see the EU
I have no idea if any of this applies to CLDR, and I'm not qualified
to determine this. But the statement, âyou can't copyright factsâ is
only true under very narrow interpretation of the terms âyouâ,
âcan'tâ, âcopyrightâ, and âfactsâ.