This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: short day translations vs cldr entries
- From: Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress at gmail dot com>
- To: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 23:38:06 -0500
- Subject: Re: short day translations vs cldr entries
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20160209075302 dot GH7732 at vapier dot lan> <20160210001848 dot GA13791 at www5 dot open-std dot org> <20160210042810 dot GU7732 at vapier dot lan>
> we don't have people to verify existing ones or write new ones. so what
> do you propose we do ? there are many more locales listed in the cldr db
> that we do not have today -- about ~510 vs ~320.
Hi again, It's been 4 years since I last did the glibc / CLDR locale
matching myself and a while since I've committed any new or modified
glibc locales, but I am potentially interested in doing some work on
porting locales to glibc.
I've been busy with other things (e,g, making a living), but I've not
un-subbed from the lists. I would probably need a little hand-holding
before I felt comfortable making my own commits on this fast-moving
project, but I still maintain a strong interest in expanding glibc
locale coverage and quality as a predicate requirement for further
L10n and i18n progress.