This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: A per-user or per-application ld.so.cache?
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:16:37 -0500
- Subject: Re: A per-user or per-application ld.so.cache?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <56B8E105 dot 8030906 at redhat dot com>
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Carlos O'Donell <email@example.com> wrote:
> Under what conditions might it make sense to implement
> a per-user ld.so.cache?
My immediate reaction is that ld.so is already too complicated and I
would hate to see it get even more complicated. Also, I'd like to
understand why these HPC apps require _thousands_ of DSOs, and what
their lifecycles are; I'm not convinced we even know what the
_problem_ is here, let alone the appropriate solution.