This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Merging some linux/generic code into linux?


On 31 Dec 2015 19:12, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > architectures? I am not sure if passing one more argument to the
> > syscalls really changes the performances.
> 
> Well, it probably increases code size compared to using the direct 
> syscalls where available.

i'm not entirely sure about this.  at least for cancellable syscalls,
i think the overhead of that logic is greater than argument shuffling.
would be good to gather real data here though.

> But some unification makes sense in at least a 
> subset of cases: those where the generic/ code is actually needed on some 
> other architectures as well.  E.g. umount (bug 16552).

those arches can still directly #include files ...
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]