This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/2] libio: Update tst-fmemopen2.c


On 06/16/2015 09:56 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> Reposting to see if I can land it for 2.22.
> 
> --
> 
> This patch updates tst-fmemopen2 to check for fmemopen with NULL buffer
> inputs and also refactor the code a bit.
> 
> The test relies on a POSIX compliant fmemopen implementation.
> 
> Tested on x86_64, i386, aarch64, and arm-linux-gnueabihf.
> 
> 	* stdio-common/tst-fmemopen2.c (do_test): Add test for NULL and zero
> 	length buffers.
> 	* stdio-common/tst-fmemopen.c (do_test): Refactor to use
> 	test-skeleton.c.

OK with nits fixed and after you checkin the fmemopen fixes.

> --
> 
> diff --git a/stdio-common/tst-fmemopen2.c b/stdio-common/tst-fmemopen2.c
> index e9d8b63..3c9dc98 100644
> --- a/stdio-common/tst-fmemopen2.c
> +++ b/stdio-common/tst-fmemopen2.c
> @@ -1,71 +1,253 @@
> +/* fmemopen tests.
> +   Copyright (C) 2014-2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +   This file is part of the GNU C Library.
> +
> +   The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +   modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> +   License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> +   version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> +
> +   The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> +   Lesser General Public License for more details.
> +
> +   You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> +   License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
> +   <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
> +
> +

OK.

>  #include <assert.h>
>  #include <stdio.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <sys/types.h>
> -
> +#include <errno.h>
>  

Please add a comment explaining what the do_test_with_buffer function does.

>  static int
> -do_test (void)
> +do_test_with_buffer (void)
>  {
>    int result = 0;
>    char buf[100];
> -  FILE *fp = fmemopen (buf, sizeof (buf), "w");
> +  const size_t nbuf = sizeof (buf);
> +
> +  FILE *fp = fmemopen (buf, nbuf, "w");
>    if (fp == NULL)
>      {
> -      puts ("fmemopen failed");
> -      return 0;
> +      printf ("%s: fmemopen failed\n", __FUNCTION__);

We should use "FAIL:" or "PASS:" text here in the prefix so
we can start tracking all the places we have multiple tests
in a single test (and eventually split out the reporting).

> +      return 1;
>      }
> +
>    static const char str[] = "hello world";
> -#define nstr (sizeof (str) - 1)
> +  const size_t nstr = sizeof (str) - 1;
>    fputs (str, fp);
>    off_t o = ftello (fp);
>    if (o != nstr)
>      {
> -      printf ("first ftello returned %jd, expected %zu\n",
> -	      (intmax_t) o, nstr);
> +      printf ("%s: first ftello returned %jd, expected %zu\n",
> +	      __FUNCTION__, (intmax_t)o, nstr);
>        result = 1;
>      }
> +
>    rewind (fp);
>    o = ftello (fp);
>    if (o != 0)
>      {
> -      printf ("second ftello returned %jd, expected 0\n", (intmax_t) o);
> +      printf ("%s: second ftello returned %jd, expected 0\n",
> +	      __FUNCTION__, (intmax_t)o);
>        result = 1;
>      }
>    if (fseeko (fp, 0, SEEK_END) != 0)
>      {
> -      puts ("fseeko failed");
> -      return 1;
> +      printf ("%s: fseeko failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
> +      result = 1;
>      }
>    o = ftello (fp);
>    if (o != nstr)
>      {
> -      printf ("third ftello returned %jd, expected %zu\n",
> -	      (intmax_t) o, nstr);
> +      printf ("%s: third ftello returned %jd, expected %zu\n",
> +	      __FUNCTION__, (intmax_t)o, nbuf);
>        result = 1;
>      }
> +
>    rewind (fp);
>    static const char str2[] = "just hello";
> -#define nstr2 (sizeof (str2) - 1)
> +  const size_t nstr2 = sizeof (str2) - 1;
>    assert (nstr2 < nstr);
>    fputs (str2, fp);
>    o = ftello (fp);
>    if (o != nstr2)
>      {
> -      printf ("fourth ftello returned %jd, expected %zu\n",
> -	      (intmax_t) o, nstr2);
> +      printf ("%s: fourth ftello returned %jd, expected %zu\n",
> +	      __FUNCTION__, (intmax_t)o, nstr2);
>        result = 1;
>      }
>    fclose (fp);
> +
>    static const char str3[] = "just hellod";
>    if (strcmp (buf, str3) != 0)
>      {
> -      printf ("final string is \"%s\", expected \"%s\"\n",
> -              buf, str3);
> +      printf ("%s: final string is \"%s\", expected \"%s\"\n",
> +              __FUNCTION__, buf, str3);
> +      result = 1;
> +    }
> +  return result;
> +}
> +

The do_test_without_buffer also needs a comment explaining briefly
what it does.

> +static int
> +do_test_without_buffer (void)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +  const size_t nbuf = 100;
> +
> +  FILE *fp = fmemopen (NULL, nbuf, "w");
> +  if (fp == NULL)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: fmemopen failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
> +      return 1;
> +    }
> +
> +  static const char str[] = "hello world";
> +  const size_t nstr = sizeof (str) - 1;
> +
> +  fputs (str, fp);
> +  off_t o = ftello (fp);
> +  if (o != nstr)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: first ftello returned %ld, expected %zu\n",
> +	      __FUNCTION__, o, nstr);
> +      result = 1;
> +    }
> +  if (fseeko (fp, 0, SEEK_END) != 0)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: fseeko failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
> +      result = 1;
> +    }
> +  o = ftello (fp);
> +  if (o != nstr)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: second ftello returned %ld, expected %zu\n",
> +	      __FUNCTION__, o, nbuf);
>        result = 1;
>      }
> +  rewind (fp);
> +  static const char str2[] = "just hello";
> +  const size_t nstr2 = sizeof (str2) - 1;
> +  assert (nstr2 < nstr);
> +  fputs (str2, fp);
> +  o = ftello (fp);
> +  if (o != nstr2)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: third ftello returned %ld, expected %zu\n",
> +	      __FUNCTION__, o, nstr2);
> +      result = 1;
> +    }
> +  fclose (fp);
> +
>    return result;
>  }
>  

Likewise.

> +static int
> +do_test_length_zero (void)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +  FILE *fp;
> +#define BUFCONTENTS "testing buffer"
> +  char buf[100] = BUFCONTENTS;
> +  const size_t nbuf = 0;
> +  int r;
> +
> +  fp = fmemopen (buf, nbuf, "r");
> +  if (fp == NULL)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: fmemopen failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
> +      return 1;
> +    }
> +
> +  /* Reading any data on a zero-length buffer should return EOF.  */
> +  if ((r = fgetc (fp)) != EOF)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: fgetc on a zero-length returned: %d\n",
> +	      __FUNCTION__, r);
> +      result = 1;
> +    }
> +  off_t o = ftello (fp);
> +  if (o != 0)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: first ftello returned %ld, expected 0\n",
> +	      __FUNCTION__, o);
> +      result = 1;
> +    }
> +  fclose (fp);
> +
> +  /* Writing any data shall start at current position and shall not pass
> +     current buffer size beyond the size in fmemopen call.  */
> +  fp = fmemopen (buf, nbuf, "w");
> +  if (fp == NULL)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: second fmemopen failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
> +      return 1;
> +    }
> +
> +  static const char str[] = "hello world";
> +  /* Because of buffering, fputs call itself don't fail, however the final

s/fputs call itself don't fail/the fputs call itself will not fail/g

> +     buffer should be not changed because of length 0 passed in fmemopen

s/of length 0 passed in fmemopen/length 0 was passed to the fmemopen/g

> +     call.  */
> +  fputs (str, fp);
> +  r = 0;
> +  errno = 0;
> +  if (fflush (fp) != EOF)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: fflush did not return EOF\n", __FUNCTION__);
> +      fclose (fp);
> +      return 1;
> +    }
> +  if (errno != ENOSPC)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: errno is %i (expected %i - ENOSPC)\n", __FUNCTION__,
> +	      errno, ENOSPC);
> +      fclose (fp);
> +      return 1;
> +    }
> +
> +  fclose (fp);
> +
> +  if (strcmp (buf, BUFCONTENTS) != 0)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: strcmp (%s, %s) failed\n", __FUNCTION__, buf,
> +	      BUFCONTENTS);
> +      return 1;
> +    }
> +
> +  /* Different than 'w' mode, 'w+' truncates the buffer.  */
> +  fp = fmemopen (buf, nbuf, "w+");
> +  if (fp == NULL)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: second fmemopen failed\n", __FUNCTION__);
> +      return 1;
> +    }
> +
> +  fclose (fp);
> +
> +  if (strcmp (buf, "") != 0)
> +    {
> +      printf ("%s: strcmp (%s, \"\") failed\n", __FUNCTION__, buf);
> +      return 1;
> +    }
> +
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +do_test (void)
> +{
> +  int ret = 0;
> +
> +  ret += do_test_with_buffer ();
> +  ret += do_test_without_buffer ();
> +  ret += do_test_length_zero ();
> +
> +  return ret;
> +}
> +
>  #define TEST_FUNCTION do_test ()
>  #include "../test-skeleton.c"
> 

Cheers,
Carlos.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]