This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [COMMITTED PATCH] Avoid C++ tests when the C++ cannot be linked.


On 03/06/2015 07:37 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> I don't like this. The semantics I would rather have are that all such
>> tests fail, not fail to build, but fail. Then the results of `make check`
>> represent reality with all the C++ tests failing because you don't have
>> a libstdc++. This way it's clear that you haven't passed all of the testing
>> for glibc.
> 
> I don't like the conflation of unbuildable with failed.  What we need is
> the possibility of UNSUPPORTED as an outcome for our tests.  I'll send a
> change in that direction.

Good point. I like UNSUPPORTED better. My worry is that these tests simply
go missing and we don't notice. Fail safe is better.

Cheers,
Carlos.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]