This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] manual: Correct type in struct timeval/timespec.
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: J William Piggott <elseifthen at gmx dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:02:30 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] manual: Correct type in struct timeval/timespec.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <6948004 dot VhtuX0CvNp at descartes> <54DD0944 dot 7070003 at redhat dot com> <54DD4AFF dot 5030505 at gmx dot com>
On 02/12/2015 07:53 PM, J William Piggott wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2015 03:12 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>
>> As a user-visible issue it requires a bug, and I've filed one for you.
>
> Is that why my patch is rejected Carlos?
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-02/msg00008.html
Not at all. It simply hasn't been reviewed. Nobody rejected your patch.
If it had been rejected the patcwork instances should have been udpated
to reflect that:
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Patch%20Review%20Workflow
> Sorry, I'm new here. I did read the checklist. It didn't sound like
> my patch required a bug. Are all changes to the manual considered
> "user-visible"? I'm not sure what that term encompasses.
They are user-visible.
Cheers,
Carlos.