This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Ignore warning in string/tester.c.


On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 08:15:47PM +0100, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> This fixes a warning in a build using a fairly recent GCC.  AFAIK the
> warning/option is new and hasn't been offered by 4.9, hence the
> conditional.  OK?

I also got warning in debian gcc-4.9 so I commited following as obvious.


diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 2edda5e..8f569ce 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 
 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c (make_request):
 	Clean up check_pf allocation pattern. addresses
+	* string/tester.c (test_memset): Suppress warning for gcc 4.9 
 
 2015-01-06  Adhemerval Zanella  <azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 
diff --git a/string/tester.c b/string/tester.c
index f957ed2..64dc056 100644
--- a/string/tester.c
+++ b/string/tester.c
@@ -1305,10 +1305,10 @@ test_memset (void)
   equal(one, "axxxefgh", 2);		/* Basic test. */
 
   DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
-#if __GNUC_PREREQ (5, 0)
-  /* GCC 5.0 warns about a zero-length memset because the arguments to memset
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 9)
+  /* GCC 4.9 warns about a zero-length memset because the arguments to memset
      may be in the wrong order.  But we really want to test this.  */
-  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (5.0, "-Wmemset-transposed-args")
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (4.9, "-Wmemset-transposed-args")
 #endif
   (void) memset(one+2, 'y', 0);
   equal(one, "axxxefgh", 3);		/* Zero-length set. */


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]