This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: question about which sleep is noted in manual

From: Ma Shimiao <shimiao dot ma at gmail dot com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, MaShimiao <mashimiao dot fnst at cn dot fujitsu dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, codonell at redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 20:39:24 +0800
Subject: Re: question about which sleep is noted in manual
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <547ED48B dot 2060509 at cn dot fujitsu dot com> <oregs9zvl2 dot fsf at free dot home> <5487EAF0 dot 70305 at cn dot fujitsu dot com> <orfvcd7a7a dot fsf at free dot home> <549787C1 dot 9020807 at cn dot fujitsu dot com> <orvbl35yq5 dot fsf at free dot home> <ormw6e4zs3 dot fsf at free dot home>

On 12/23/2014 02:59 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

This one is actually tested (sorry, I forgot to mention I hadn't tested
the earlier patchset due to the -Werror build failures, now fixed in my
tree with the patch I posted earlier).

I have also verified that, without the change to sleep.c, the test
fails.

I don't think this is user-visible enough to deserve a bug report and a
mention in NEWS, but if anyone disagrees with this assessment, please
let me now and I'll file the bug report and adjust the patch.

Ok to install?

This patch looks good to me.

References:
- Re: question about which sleep is noted in manual
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: question about which sleep is noted in manual
  - From: MaShimiao
- Re: question about which sleep is noted in manual
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: question about which sleep is noted in manual
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]