This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Subsystem maintainers
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:47:29 +0000
- Subject: Re: Subsystem maintainers
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1409232040060 dot 8132 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1409301439570 dot 15186 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <542AC26E dot 5070906 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1410071615260 dot 28196 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1410131134410 dot 20836 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1410201529370 dot 12154 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20141020181534 dot DBD182C3B0D at topped-with-meat dot com>
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Should I take it that we have consensus on the idea of subsystem
> > maintainers, with me as such a maintainer for soft-fp and the conform/
> > tests? (I don't think anyone commented on me as a maintainer for the math
> > component.)
>
> I'm fine with all that, including math.
I've now added the concept of subsystem maintainers to
<https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/MAINTAINERS>, with myself listed for
soft-fp and conform/ (still hoping for any more comments regarding the
math component, and more volunteers as maintainers for the more
specialised and self-contained areas, or reviewers for any area would be
welcome).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com