This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 04:30:50PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > What's the right state for "the patch was only ever an RFC or proof of > concept rather than proposed for inclusion as-is"? There is an 'RFC' status available in the default list which we can use for such patches, but marking the patch as RFC by the submitter would mean that reviewers may never see them in the default view, which shows only unresolved patches, i.e. those in NEW state. I'll see if there's a way to change the default view so that it shows patches in states other than just NEW. If that is not possible immediately, then we could continue using the RFC and/or WIP tag on the email subject to indicate such patches. Siddhesh
Attachment:
pgpiIr4OkDwoQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |