This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Problems with evolving feature test macros?


Hi Mike,

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue 11 Mar 2014 18:58:30 Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
>> > On 03/11/2014 09:33 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> >> I have no specific examples to cite.
>> >
>> > Likewise for most developers of portable software, which is why this is a
>> > non-issue for them.  Feature-test macros don't suffice for portable
>> > software, and typically aren't even helpful; they mostly just get in the
>> > way..
>>
>> Well, given that perspective, why go through the current effort trying
>> to tidy things up/
>
> you mean on the glibc side ?  because the C library needs to support a variety
> of standards, and if someone says they need a specific level of conformance,
> it'd be better that we don't leak in other things (and in some cases, leaking
> extra stuff would violate the standard requested).

Actually, my question was rhetorical. Paul appeared to be saying that
FTMs are a complete waste of time, so I was asking (rhetorically) why
he thought glibc was doing the current work.


-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]