This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Consensus on MT-, AS- and AC-Safety docs.

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal dot cx>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:47:47 +0100
Subject: Re: Consensus on MT-, AS- and AC-Safety docs.
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <528A7C8F dot 8060805 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311182312130 dot 8831 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <orob5fv8nl dot fsf at livre dot home> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311201555320 dot 28804 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <orli0itbm5 dot fsf at livre dot home> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311211322040 dot 14539 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <or4n75t4b7 dot fsf at livre dot home> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311221324200 dot 5029 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <orob5csdvx dot fsf at livre dot home> <52985836 dot 4050700 at redhat dot com> <orli05k7sd dot fsf at livre dot home>

On 11/30/2013 08:29 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

On Nov 29, 2013, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:

Hmm.  Could we make this data available in machine-parsable form,
under a free software license (which the GFDL isn't)?


The @safety notes are always right after the corresponding
@deftypefu?nx? lines, and the transition to macros for all keywords
should make this even more parseable than it was.  I'm sure we can
contribute the code with an additional permission for the information to
be extracted and transformed under some other license.

Do you have any specific license in mind?


I'd suggest to use the same license as for the C source code.

--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Consensus on MT-, AS- and AC-Safety docs.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]