This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Re: [PATCH][BZ 15593] Add transliteration data for "LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH STROKE" (Ã)
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Marko Myllynen <myllynen at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Toke HÃiland-JÃrgensen <toke at toke dot dk>, <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:53:52 +0000
- Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH][BZ 15593] Add transliteration data for "LATIN SMALL LETTER O WITH STROKE" (Ã)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <87r4bkdsyn dot fsf at toke dot dk> <525FDF58 dot 1040002 at redhat dot com>
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Marko Myllynen wrote:
> Also, I wonder how do we cope with these kind of local additions when
> resolving bug 14094?
I don't think either 14094 (character map, LC_CTYPE) or 14095 (collation)
has anything to do with transliteration, and I wasn't aware of our
transliteration data coming from any upstream source for which there would
be merge issues for local changes.
Of course for both those bugs we do need to understand exactly how the
present files in glibc relate to an old version of the upstream data, in
order to make a correct merge, but I hope that in most cases, especially
for 14094, if we use the latest upstream data correctly we will be able to
satisfy ourselves that, if local changes made different choices from
upstream, there's no real advantage to the local version over the upstream
Joseph S. Myers