This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Define __STDC_IEC_559* based on __GCC_IEC_559*
- From: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:37:26 +0200
- Subject: Re: Define __STDC_IEC_559* based on __GCC_IEC_559*
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1310152140310 dot 29753 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20131016080849 dot GA6955 at domone dot podge> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1310161206331 dot 10873 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 12:10:04PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Ondrej Bilka wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 09:42:49PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > > 2013-10-15 Joseph Myers <email@example.com>
> > >
> > > * include/stdc-predef.h [__GCC_IEC_559] (__STDC_IEC_559__): Define
> > > depending on [__GCC_IEC_559 > 0].
> > > [__GCC_IEC_559_COMPLEX] (__STDC_IEC_559_COMPLEX__): Define
> > > depending on [__GCC_IEC_559_COMPLEX > 0].
> > >
> > Missing bug 15720 entry.
> I consider that bug INVALID. This patch doesn't "fix" it (a "fix" would
> be a new feature in GCC, followed by corresponding <complex.h> and
> <tgmath.h> changes in glibc to handle imaginary types); it simply
> clarifies the use of the macros as relating to intent rather than
> completeness and refines the details of how intent is determined.
If you consider it invalid then close it.