This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v1.1][BZ #15362] Correctly return bytes written out in _IO_new_file_write
- From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh dot poyarekar at gmail dot com>
- To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3 at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:22:19 +0530
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v1.1][BZ #15362] Correctly return bytes written out in _IO_new_file_write
- References: <CAAHN_R2FdXBd8869PksUgiM0KFGPJfnnwssucOGL9t9s9k67ow at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 15 April 2013 08:21, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> needed. I think that after the revert, bug 1174 would be fixed just by
>> changing PAD() in the way I suggested. The other issues I have brought up, such
>
> OK, I'll post the patch for the revert to close 15362 and then reopen
> 1174. Once that is done, you can post an updated patch for pr#1174.
>
On second thoughts, it would be better if you just do the revert in
your patch submission itself, like you did earlier - it saves having
to keep a broken test case while your patch is being reviewed. Could
you post the patch again in a separate thread so that it can be
reviewed?
Thanks,
Siddhesh
--
http://siddhesh.in