This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2.1] Use long for mantissa for generic mp code

From: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 07:55:32 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1] Use long for mantissa for generic mp code
References: <20130226154206.GY21039@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <512D04C2.4020505@twiddle.net> <CAAHN_R2buNZ6N0Q6K86yaTq2hz_uc-8MoNyrnTZO3DfC62q2ig@mail.gmail.com> <512D7D56.2030209@twiddle.net> <20130308123807.GA21984@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com> <5140AD70.7090808@twiddle.net> <20130314082826.GT22471@spoyarek.pnq.redhat.com>

On 03/14/2013 01:28 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> Using bit shifts instead of division makes (as expected) a neat
> positive difference to performance of pow of about 5%.  I've also made
> the comment for INTEGER_OF more verbose.  No regressions to the
> tstsuite.  Should I go ahead and commit this?

Looks good to me now.


r~

References:
- [PATCH v2] Use long for mantissa for generic mp code
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH v2] Use long for mantissa for generic mp code
  - From: Richard Henderson
- [PATCH v2.1] Use long for mantissa for generic mp code
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]