This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 0/N] test-suite improvement - PASS/FAIL: initial patch

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Tomas Dohnalek <tdohnale at redhat dot com>
Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:28:40 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/N] test-suite improvement - PASS/FAIL: initial patch
References: <1780760144.35677.1347810417875.JavaMail.root@redhat.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1209161626340.9347@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><5056485E.4060409@redhat.com>

On Sun, 16 Sep 2012, Tomas Dohnalek wrote:

> > (An order-only prerequisite
> > 
> > tests-collect-results: | tests xtests
> > 
> > might do the job, I think.)
> 
> but this solution has disadvantage - if rule `tests' is made with errors, rule
> `tests-collect-results' will not proceed. But I can't figure out any way out.

Maybe

check:
	-$(MAKE) tests
	$(tests-collect-results)

where tests-collect-results is a variable (defined with define/endef) with 
the relevant commands in, used in all rules that need it?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/N] test-suite improvement - PASS/FAIL: initial patch
  - From: Tomas Dohnalek

References:
- Re: [PATCH 0/N] test-suite improvement - PASS/FAIL: initial patch
  - From: Tomas Dohnalek
- Re: [PATCH 0/N] test-suite improvement - PASS/FAIL: initial patch
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [PATCH 0/N] test-suite improvement - PASS/FAIL: initial patch
  - From: Tomas Dohnalek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]