This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: TLS configure check question (why assembly?)

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: Marek Polacek <polacek at redhat dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Steve Ellcey <sellcey at mips dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: TLS configure check question (why assembly?)
References: <661716fd-78f0-4774-ad53-4b2170727aa5@EXCHHUB01.MIPS.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1207101632130.23211@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><20120710170826.GE3441@redhat.com>

> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:34:50PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > I think those tests could now be considered obsolete and could be removed 
> > - the requirement for binutils version 2.20 or later means TLS support can 
> > be assumed to be present.
> 
> Shall I file a bug for this removal of TLS configure checks?

Sounds good.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TLS configure check question (why assembly?)
  - From: Marek Polacek

References:
- TLS configure check question (why assembly?)
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: TLS configure check question (why assembly?)
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: TLS configure check question (why assembly?)
  - From: Marek Polacek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]