This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] add kexec_load() syscall


On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 13:04:21 Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 12:04:21 +0200, maximilian attems <max@stro.at> 
wrote:
> > diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list
> > b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list index eef6d82..e530b19 100644
> > --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list
> > +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/syscalls.list
> > @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ inotify_init1	EXTRA	inotify_init1	i:I	
inotify_init1
> > 
> >  inotify_rm_watch	EXTRA	inotify_rm_watch	i:ii	inotify_rm_watch
> >  ioperm		-	ioperm		i:iii	ioperm
> >  iopl		-	iopl		i:i	iopl
> > 
> > +kexec_load	EXTRA	kexec_load	i:pipi	kexec_load
> > 
> >  klogctl		EXTRA	syslog		i:isi	klogctl
> >  lchown		-	lchown		i:sii	__lchown	lchown
> >  madvise		-	madvise		i:pii	madvise
> 
> I wonder, shouldn't also a generic ENOSYS implementation be added?  And
> the new interface be announced in NEWS?


This is all Linux specific - and every architecture has it. So, no need for 
a generic ENOSYS IMO.

Announcing via NEWS is indeed something we should do,

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
  SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
   GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
    GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]