This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Don't document fclean

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:30:16 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Don't document fclean
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1202270036250.30479@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><CADZpyiyuBoEfjYYbNfFCCtCQv3iAcD6-8U0kdoq5=9zd9x8nzw@mail.gmail.com><20120227175152.18A572C126@topped-with-meat.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1202272020290.22114@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

> Thanks for the history.  I don't think this changes the basic argument for 
> my patch (that the manual should document facilities that are actually 
> implemented, and if someone implements fclean in future then the 
> documentation can be added back at that point).

Certainly the patch is fine.  Carlos asked (I presume just out of
curiosity), so I answered.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Don't document fclean
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

References:
- Don't document fclean
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Don't document fclean
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: Don't document fclean
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: Don't document fclean
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]