This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Should --enable-bounded be removed?
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Jan 2012, Roland McGrath wrote:
> >
> > > Sure. I just meant to suggest the wiki as a canonical place to keep track.
> > > i.e., put it on the wiki now so we don't forget about it, though I am not
> > > fully sanguine about actively removing support yet.
> >
> > What about Bugzilla (that is, one bug for each thing it seems a good idea
> > to remove but isn't being actively removed yet, and maybe a meta-bug to
> > depend on the others)?
>
> Whatever works. I just want to see something actually adopted as a
> procedure and stuck to in the future.
I've filed the following bugs which cover my current list of things I
think it's time to remove:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13550 (--enable-bounded)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13551 (non-ELF)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13552 (--enable-omitfp)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13553 (__const etc.)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13554 (pre-2.6 Linux)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13555 (configure support for old targets)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13556 (ports: ARM old-ABI)
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com