This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ld.so's LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_PRELOAD in mixed 32bit and 64bit environment

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alon dot barlev at gmail dot com>
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:49:10 -0400
Subject: Re: ld.so's LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_PRELOAD in mixed 32bit and 64bit environment
References: <CAOazyz3tfETan+5WgBP_XiEL01ggbKj4+5mx98NeOD9fZoKx=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOazyz2Oz2pLF4s-p+mSZHvZF+LXZPj4At4LCoejrto9xRNpfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOazyz25pP28pbwh-9x54j0rn6UJDUskSmbOseU0X4-HwECyOw@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday, August 22, 2011 04:40:55 Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I can see that LD_LIBRARY_PATH is substituted, but LD_PRELOAD is not.
> 
> What do you think of adding call to expand_dynamic_string_token() in
> ./elf/rtld.c::do_preload() to add this behavior to LD_PRELOAD as well?

makes sense to me, but i'm not an upstream maintainer ;)
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

References:
- ld.so's LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_PRELOAD in mixed 32bit and 64bit environment
  - From: Alon Bar-Lev
- Re: ld.so's LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_PRELOAD in mixed 32bit and 64bit environment
  - From: Alon Bar-Lev
- Re: ld.so's LD_LIBRARY_PATH/LD_PRELOAD in mixed 32bit and 64bit environment
  - From: Alon Bar-Lev

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]