This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Maintaining 2.12
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: Matt Turner <mattst88 at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Petr Baudis <pasky at suse dot cz>, roland at redhat dot com, schwab at redhat dot com, ams at gnu dot org, joseph at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 11:58:45 -0400
- Subject: Re: Maintaining 2.12
- References: <20100513142934.GK16800@machine.or.cz><201006211500.28585.vapier@gentoo.org><201007261852.18256.vapier@gentoo.org><AANLkTimWcxfbcgtrz3DjkuM95TMPfCM+wesRE6ZLNj+c@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Monday, June 21, 2010 15:00:26 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> so it looks like glibc-2.12 has been branched in git about a week ago. ?and
>>> it's been about 1.5 months since glibc-2.12 was tagged, and fortunately
>>> glibc- ports was tagged shortly there after.
>>>
>>> will the tarballs be packaged soon now ?
>>
>> another month gone by ... are we going back to the system where distros have
>> to roll their own tarballs ?
>> -mike
>
> There are glibc-2.12.1 tarballs on ftp.gnu.org/gnu/glibc/ as of Aug 3.
> Never saw any announcement though.
>
> I don't understand all the bureaucracy around this project. Just make
> some tarballs already.
There is a checklist: http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release
Andreas, did you following the checklist?
Cheers,
Carlos.